08/14/03 ATLANTIC MUT. INS. CO. v TERK TECH. CORP
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
“Knowledge of Falsity” Exclusion Leads to Ruling that Carrier Has No Duty to Defend Lanham Act Case
08/11/03 AMERICAN REF-FUEL COMPANY OF HEMPSTEAD v RESOURCE RECYCLING, INC.
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Bruce Celebrezze and Teresa Hu, Celebrezze & Wesley, San Francisco, CA
08/11/03 MATTER OF GEICO GEN. INS. CO. v SHERMAN
New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
08/07/03 CRITCHLOW v FIRST UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AM.,
Second Circuit (applying New York law)
Autoerotic Asphyxiation Causes Intentionally Inflicted Injury under “Accidental Death” Policy
Across Borders
08/14/03 MACKINNON v TRUCK INS. EXCHANGE
Absolute Pollution Exclusion Limited to Conventional Environmental Pollution
08/13/03 GOOCH v WESTFIELD INS. CO.
Ohio Court of Appeals, Ninth Judicial District
Bruce Celebrezze and Teresa Hu, Celebrezze & Wesley, San Francisco, CA
08/11/03 SAFECO INS. CO. OF AMERICA v MARES
Bruce Celebrezze and Teresa Hu, Celebrezze & Wesley, San Francisco, CA
Fire, First Party & Subrogation Team
James D. Gauthier, Team Leader
© COPYRIGHT 2003 Hurwitz & Fine, P.C., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ATLANTIC MUT. INS. CO. v TERK TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
The Relevant Policy Provisions
but only if the offense was committed in the "coverage territory" during the policy period.
This insurance does not apply to:
a. "Personal injury" or "advertising injury"
Section V of the Policy, under the banner "DEFINITIONS," provides:
1. "Advertising injury" means injury arising out of one or more of the following offenses:
b. Oral or written publication of material that violates a person's right of privacy;
c. Misappropriation of advertising ideas or style of doing business; or
d. Infringement of copyright, title or slogan.
All concur except Andrias, J. who concurs in result only in a separate Opinion.
ANDRIAS, J. (concurring in result only)
AMERCIAN REF-FUEL CO. OF HEMPSTEAD v RESOURCE RECYCLING, INC.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., McGINITY, SCHMIDT and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
MATTER OF GEICO GENERAL INS. CO. v SHERMAN
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioner.
The appellants' remaining
contentions are without merit.